Scientific Publications Database

Article Title: Radical Treatment of Stage II Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With Nonsurgical Approaches: A Multi-institution Report of Outcomes
Authors: Dudani, Shaan; Zhu, Xiaofu; Yokom, Daniel W.; Yamada, Andrew; Ho, Cheryl; Pantarotto, Jason R.; Leighl, Natasha B.; Zhang, Tinghua; Wheatley-Price, Paul
Journal: CLINICAL LUNG CANCER Volume 19 Issue 1
Date of Publication:2018
Abstract:
The optimal nonoperative management of stage II nonesmall-cell lung cancer is undefined, with limited data to guide decision-making in this setting. We reviewed treatment patterns and outcomes of 158 patients in this defined group. The majority (73%) received radical radiotherapy alone; however, those treated with combined-modality chemoradiation had significantly longer median survival (39.1 vs. 20.5 months; P = .0019). A randomized trial is warranted.Introduction: Standard management of stage II nonesmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgery, often followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. However, some patients do not undergo surgery for various reasons. We examined outcomes in this defined patient group. Methods: We reviewed the records of patients with stage II NSCLC treated nonsurgically with curative intent from 2002 to 2012 across 3 academic cancer centers. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, staging, treatments, and survival. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We assessed factors associated with treatment choice and OS. Results: A total of 158 patients were included: the median age was 74 years (range, 50-91 years), 44% were female, and 68% had a performance status of 0 to 1. The stage II groupings of the patients were T2b-T3 N0 in 55% and N1 in 45%. The most common reasons for inoperability were inadequate pulmonary reserve (27%) and medical comorbidities (24%). All patients received radical radiotherapy (RT) (median, 60 Gy [range, 48-75 Gy]). Seventy-three percent received RT alone; 24% received concurrent and 3% sequential chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In multivariate analyses, CRT was less likely in older patients (similar to 70 years) (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.70; P = .006) and in patients with higher (> 5) Charlson comorbidity scores (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.90; P = .03) or normal (< 10 x 10(9)/L) white blood cell counts (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.73; P = .01). At the time of our analysis, 74% have died. The median OS was 22.9 months (range, 17.1-26.6 months). Patients who had undergone CRT had a significantly longer median OS than those receiving RT alone (39.1 vs. 20.5 months; P = .0019), confirmed in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.69; P = .001). Conclusion: Nonsurgical approaches to management of stage II NSCLC are varied. Treatment with CRT was associated with significantly longer survival compared with RT alone. A randomized trial may be warranted.